HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 21:44
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 290
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 920
87% 722 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 87.5
79% 93.4 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 75.8
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 894
Write 989
Mixed 854
204% 912 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.1
196% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 714
534% 688 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
459GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 472 467 472 464 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 453
Mixed 399
SusWrite 454
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 48
158% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 204
170% 239 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144
876GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 472 468 472 464 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 467
Mixed 407
SusWrite 454
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 47.4
152% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 185
158% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W642GU42J9266N8 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 22.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 5R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 33% 27 277 193 60 31.5" 1920 1080 VIZ1022 E32-D1
History: Score 41: 4R 5G 6B | Score 35: 5R 3G 1B
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback