Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 12:40
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 183
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 352
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 40.2
35% 42.6 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 35.3
30% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 233 173 72 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 328
Write 216
Mixed 238
SusWrite 129
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 34
111% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 152
114% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
667GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 155 153 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 162
Write 117
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 150
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB
399GB free
Firmware: SD25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 82 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 13.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 88
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB
465GB free, PID 0951
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23.9
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 26.8
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24F4 ASUS 24T1E
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback