Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 32.4 1-Core 49.7 2-Core 93 33% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 95.1 8-Core 96.9 13% 96 Pts	64-Core 94.8 6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB 16,899 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMKA.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 320 359 356 359 367 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 358 Write 352 Mixed 329 SusWrite 350 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 30.3 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 144 108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde 2x4GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 241 17% 241 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	14x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	12x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	4x
M500 480GBCrucial $84Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	2x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16