HP Compaq nx6125 (PY418ET#ABE)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq nx6125 (PY418ET#ABE)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 308B
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 Mobile ML-28
U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 23.1
27% 34.4 Pts
4-Core 22.6
8-Core 21.6
3% 22.1 Pts
64-Core 22.7
1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST960822A 60GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.9 6.7 6.5 6.7 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 10.1
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 6.3
7% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 17%
USB DISK Pro 16GB
3GB free, PID 3623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Read 10.1
Write 2.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.5
5% 4.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.43% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback