Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 47.3 1-Core 20 2-Core 28.2 24% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 39.8 8-Core 38.5 5% 39.2 Pts	64-Core 32.2 2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908D) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0724S SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 143 188 256 272 199 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 339 Write 251 Mixed 263 SusWrite 219 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 9.7 47% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 26 35% 65 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	8%	49	18	11	60	15.5"	1366 768	SEC3253

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 8: 1R 0G 3B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16