Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon TF-20 408 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 45 1-Core 18.9 2-Core 16.2 21% 26.7 Pts	4-Core 19.7 8-Core 21.2 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 20.4 1% 20.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 0.6 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 67 67 48 66 67 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.7% Below average	Read 206 Write 71.7 Mixed 115 SusWrite 67.6 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 13.3 58% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 71.5 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 28.9 32% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 78%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 5.8 8.4 4.6 3.6 7.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 5.2 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 5.5 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.2 159% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata HYOVF1B163GZM 2x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16