HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 14:44
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 291
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,120
101% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
HP(103C 8701) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 230
Parallax 162
134% 185 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 140
Splatting 125
123% 155 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1197
Write 853
Mixed 27.9
151% 693 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 17
91% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 28.2
56% 122 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 203%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 320
Mixed 267
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 12
43% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 37.6
40% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 70%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
138GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 275 279 303 249 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 399
Write 399
Mixed 327
SusWrite 286
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 35.9
115% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 230
195% 285 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 118%
NG1906 1TB
148GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 632 676 685 692 697 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 70% Great: 79%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 116 119 119 118 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.2% Very poor
Read 124
Write 104
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 118
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.7
6% 3.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
628GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 198 197 201 201 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 166
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 196
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
iOS devi FLASH DRIVE 268GB
250GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.1 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1
1% 1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
14% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 17.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHC0490 H3C2R-HQ
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback