Pegatron IPMSB-H61

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPegatron IPMSB-H61  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMSB-H61
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120412
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 07:24
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 147
58% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 156
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1302) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 21 12 12 26 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 73.4
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 27.6
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 4% 77 8 6 60 17.1" 1280 1024 IBM24C9 IBM L171
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B | Score 9: 1R 1G 1B
Typical IPMSB-H61 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPMSB-H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback