Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 03:59
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 135
59% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 243
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 70
60% 71.6 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 54.8
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Valuetech-SSD/256G 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 32 23 32 34 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 391
Write 131
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 32.1
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 0.7
33% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 4
DQ Mixed 0.2
5% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
576GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 164 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 148
Mixed 102
SusWrite 163
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 859B BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.7
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 16% 43 11 9 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback