Gigabyte GA-TRX40 DESIGNARE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX40 DESIGNARE  (all builds)
Memory74.1 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 18:15
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,162
103% 875 Pts
64-Core 4,312
267% 4,312 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
641GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 1856 1854 1851 1608 1970 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,811
Write 2,914
Mixed 2,850
SusWrite 1,905
590% 2,620 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 92.7
302% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 687
511% 683 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 353%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 148 148 148 146 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 494
Write 135
Mixed 193
SusWrite 148
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.6
41% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
2TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 184 183 183 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 498
Write 150
Mixed 215
SusWrite 182
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.7
44% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 185 185 186 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 503
Write 178
Mixed 244
SusWrite 185
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
63% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
633GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 143 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 2,619
Write 177
Mixed 326
SusWrite 116
171% 809 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.1
99% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 139%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 177 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 2662
Write 172
Mixed 328
SusWrite 177
177% 835 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.3
108% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 146%
Great: 410%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 197 195 197 196 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 242 241 244 240 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE16G4D32AEEA.K16FB 5x16GB
5 of 8 slots used
80GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 40.1
116% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 35.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 108%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 64 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-TRX40 DESIGNARE Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX40 DESIGNARE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $2,653
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback