Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '17 at 13:16
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 90
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 15.2
16% 16.6 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 17
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
262GB free
Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 130
100% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 103%
Hdt72251 6DLA380 160GB
133GB free
Firmware: V43O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 48
Mixed 51.7
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.34
93% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 30%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
345GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 103
Mixed 14.4
84% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.18
34% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 13.8
Mixed 28.3
44% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.05
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.91
101% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8FE 1311 M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-DI 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback