Intel S2600WFQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S2600WFQ  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 108
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 815
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 2,717
168% 2,717 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKB240G8 240GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XC311102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 208 206 232 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 304
Write 257
Mixed 292
SusWrite 228
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 26.3
93% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 239
187% 259 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%
STEC USB 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 0003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 15
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 14.3
23% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston AM4D426R19S8HBX1 2x4GB
2 of 24 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 7% 87 28 17 64 0" 1024 768
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 20: 3R 1G 2B
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback