Asrock H410M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H410M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G6600 44 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 195 80% 136 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 320 44% 325 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.5% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 46 Parallax 33.8 29% 38.5 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 27.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 357 362 312 258 284 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 410 Mixed 393 SusWrite 313 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 45.1 140% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 248 212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 125%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 2.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.8 7% 6.6 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 16%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6 6.3 8.3 9 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 9.9 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 7.8 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.2 217% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 7R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	23%	77	307	236	60	21.5"	1920 1080	PHLC0CF PHL 223V5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M-HVS Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	281x
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	237x
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	65x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	61x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	27x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	33x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	23x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16