Acer Aspire A515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Grumpy_PK
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 120
56% 91 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 182
27% 195 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 85 84 82 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 893
Write 152
Mixed 237
SusWrite 84.3
74% 342 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 34.1
139% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 145
118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (85th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 6% 88 64 49 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP003D
Typical Aspire A515-43 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback