Asus A88X-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88X-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 67
2-Core 162
55% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 238
34% 248 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 41.5
24% 33.7 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 33
Splatting 27.3
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 350 354 367 258 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
613GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 133 144 144 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 145
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 140
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.5% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 17
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 7R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 25% 57 187 75 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACI22CA ASUS VP229
Typical A88X-GAMER Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback