HP 530 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 530 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D5
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080318
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 03:36
Run Duration1100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2400
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 32.5
29% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 34.5
8-Core 33.2
5% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 35.9
2% 35.9 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-256 256GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMX1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 100 53 50 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 125
Write 120
Mixed 116
SusWrite 81.4
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 18.2
66% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 88.2
67% 90 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback