Biostar FX9830M

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar FX9830M (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1804 x 1026 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200115
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 36.6 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 108 33% 60.8 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 179 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 18.6 14% 18.1 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 19 Splatting 16.8 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 126 117 108 75 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 397 Write 320 Mixed 206 SusWrite 130 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 13.6 39% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 47.4 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 35.3 29% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN 1x8GB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 7R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
56%	19%	103	173	93	60	0.7"	1804 1026	VES3700 24W_LCD_TV

History: Score 27: 2R 4G 5B | Score 55: 7R 5G 5B | Score 56: 7R 4G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FX9830M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar FX9830M

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	5x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	1x
WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GBWDCBench 46%, 14,337 samples	1x
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GBBench 71%, 468 samples	1x

RAM
INNO16G2666S 1x16GBUnknownBench 37%, 19 samples	2x
Value DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 80%, 4,888 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16