Hyrican H110M PRO-D

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hyrican H110M PRO-D (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '17 at 20:25
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$123 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 225 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 452 60% 452 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 854D) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 46.9 Parallax 41.4 39% 45.5 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 38 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74 29,295 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0330AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 480 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 513 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 41 (A3) Unknown 100 100 207 (94) Unknown 100 100 173580 (95) Unknown 100 100 2531 (96) Unknown 100 100 2409 (97) Unknown 100 100 2515 (A4) Unknown 100 100 58759 (A5) Unknown 100 100 112 (A6) Unknown 100 100 8 (A7) Unknown 100 100 45 (A9) Unknown 100 100 96 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 38651067629598 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 265581 (F2) Unknown 100 100 132259 (F5) Unknown 100 100 347045 (F6) Unknown 100 100 347160 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	70.1% Very good	Read 485 Write 256 Mixed 217 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 22.6 98% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 20.6 DQ Mixed 48.7 55% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896436407 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2117 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 508 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1798 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1798 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 167504773153 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 186 Mixed 93.9 114% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.22 88% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 500GB 682 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 70GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 39.7 Write 41.6 Mixed 38.3 52% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.37 43% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 22%
Intenso Alu Line 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 9GB free, PID 1327 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.61% Terrible	Read 26 Write 12.7 Mixed 8.32 17% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.76 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.56 58% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 2x8GB 2,319 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 22.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-D Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Hyrican H110M PRO-D

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	59x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	36x
Core i5-6600Intel $123Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	15x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
SP580 120GBAdataBench 54%, 3,644 samples	6x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 1,583 samples	23x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 3,127 samples	19x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 2,416 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16