Samsung 370E4K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung 370E4K  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT370E4K-K02/C
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 12:26
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3205U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 78.5
36% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 80.3
8-Core 76.1
11% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 74.6
5% 74.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.9
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 960X 500GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S7PA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 176 131 184 86 65 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 406
Write 332
Mixed 316
SusWrite 150
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 29.5
91% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 108
97% 147 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 1 60 13.9" 1366 768 BOE05FE
Typical 370E4K Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 370E4K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback