Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7015 R2, 4 Compute Cores 2C+2G 11 User benchmarks, average bench 21% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 43.6 31% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 42 8-Core 44.6 6% 43.3 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Carrizo 9874 8 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 87A5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.50.02 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB 2,813 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 106 35 67 34 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 338 Write 161 Mixed 229 SusWrite 86 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 16.4 55% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 86.9 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 60.3 48% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 2x2GB 640 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.4 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	75	23.8"	1280 720	SAM711B LF24T370F

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E2-7015 R2, 4 Compute Cores 2C+2GAMDBench 21%, 11 samples	1x

GPU
9874CarrizoBench 1%, 8 samples	1x

RAM
SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBCorsairBench 25%, 1,241 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16