Acer Swift SF314-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-43  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Sake_CA
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 38.9
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 131
43% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 516
46% 389 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1537) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 33.9
7% 20.6 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 17.6
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 290 280 287 286 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,251
Write 1,027
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 290
202% 903 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 35.9
146% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 524
383% 506 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 134%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4U6E3S4AA-MGCR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 26
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical Swift SF314-43 Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback