MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 16:59
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 331
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,183
109% 913 Pts
64-Core 2,252
139% 2,252 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 197
Parallax 192
184% 205 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 149
Splatting 121
136% 174 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 154%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 38 9.1 316 15 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 854
Mixed 903
SusWrite 71.1
181% 818 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 81.6
296% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 2.6
97% 232 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 169%
Great: 242%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
333GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 493 493 493 493 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 490
Mixed 464
SusWrite 493
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 67.3
221% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 370
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
717GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 106 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 108
Write 75.5
Mixed 71
SusWrite 104
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 37.5
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 126%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback