Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 76 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 186 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 351 48% 354 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C758) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.9% Very good	Lighting 91.4 Reflection 90.2 Parallax 85 74% 88.9 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 80.1 Splatting 71.2 70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD1003FZEX-00MK2A0 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 39 50 6.2 24 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive	Read 215 Write 174 Mixed 126 SusWrite 39.2 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 19.7 56% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 21.8 57% 119 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 93%
Sandisk S240G 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 190GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 154 104 147 157 156 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 145 Write 151 Mixed 123 SusWrite 142 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 4% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 6R 7G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	28%	67	104	2	60	23.1"	1920 1080	GSM56F0 W2353

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	217x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	131x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	72x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	59x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	14x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	51x
ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 371 samples	20x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 4,503 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16