HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	43.4 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 140 59% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 474 46% 380 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 2,114 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 4.3 7% 7.73 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 3.5 5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 114 114 113 112 97 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 119 Write 92.2 Mixed 169 SusWrite 116 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 22.5 73% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 60.8 DQ Mixed 35.1 30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB 1,413 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OAA30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 158 157 158 157 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 155 Mixed 93 SusWrite 157 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 85%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01K02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 164 165 165 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 155 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 164 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 440GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 23.9 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 24 34% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 82GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	144x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	99x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16