HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 14:09
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65% Good	Memory 74.4 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 170 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 489 48% 395 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 392.65 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 8.1 5% 7.4 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 7.3 6% 7.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 308 309 308 310 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 464 Write 340 Mixed 287 SusWrite 308 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 28.3 102% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 235 208% 314 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 500GB 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 455GB free Firmware: RVT44B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 244 240 239 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	76.7% Very good	Read 259 Write 244 Mixed 243 SusWrite 240 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 42 137% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GB 2,928 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD0259

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	199x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	499x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	298x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $119	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16