Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 709
70% 574 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 31.9
27% 32.5 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 23.1
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 83 41 160 52 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 501
Write 445
Mixed 412
SusWrite 132
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 23.4
113% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 0.5
69% 159 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB
450GB free
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 487 488 489 492 492 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 476
SusWrite 485
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 53.8
179% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 376
283% 378 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
TOSHIBA MK6459GSX 640GB
582GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 30 8 29 9.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 30
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 19.3
40% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28.6
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24C7 ASUS VP247
Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback