Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 143 2-Core 275 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 718 73% 589 Pts	64-Core 982 61% 982 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 207 Parallax 8.7 5% 74 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 11.8 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 254% 565GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1658 1637 1617 1455 1347 1351 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1,910 Write 1,986 Mixed 1,520 SusWrite 1,511 390% 1,732 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 76.3 250% 84.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,088 DQ Write 894 DQ Mixed 1,008 750% 997 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB 15,521 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 27.8 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 29.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	TMX1560 TL156VDXP02-0

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	736x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	337x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	210x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	180x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	320x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	185x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	221x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	173x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	101x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16