Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C9
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160812
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 28 '17 at 05:47
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 160
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 243
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4574
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 4.78
4% 5.92 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 11
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 138
Write 150
Mixed 152
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.14
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Wave Desktop 600-a0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback