Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 141 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 350 40% 310 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO 2,899 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 01C2) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF8704RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 121 130 92 101 122 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 225 Write 204 Mixed 111 SusWrite 124 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 6.7 50% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 99.8 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 32.9 37% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 59.3 68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $367

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16