Lenovo 20RXS0BL00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 38% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20RXS0BL00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20RXS0BL00
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 20:37
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 290
44% 318 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 4.7
6% 5.8 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 13.2
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 930 712 777 775 768 755 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,854
Write 1968
Mixed 1,321
SusWrite 786
332% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.4
256% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 460
377% 549 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 228%
Great: 347%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14.7
Mixed 1.7
6% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-050.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN4162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback