Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PH
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 15:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 119
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 314
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 1274 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5.7
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 32 32 30 29 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 346
Write 387
Mixed 342
SusWrite 45.2
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 41.8
154% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 185
165% 244 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB2-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM5ACB LG HD
Typical GA-H110M-S2PH-CF Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback