Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS X570-ACE  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 325
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1107
106% 873 Pts
64-Core 1572
97% 1572 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB; ROG-STRIX-RTX3070TI-O8G-GAMING
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 221
Parallax 234
202% 234 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 165
Splatting 134
146% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 1003 1006 1004 1019 1007 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,029
Write 2,303
Mixed 1,792
SusWrite 1,028
402% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 82.2
298% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,359
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,237
932% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 292%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-32GTRS 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 38.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS X570-ACE Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS X570-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback