HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3567
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín, 1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime382.6 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 07:40
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3305M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 46.9
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 33.2
26% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 50.8
8-Core 56
7% 53.4 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G
HP(103C 1663) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.9
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 86 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 233
Write 103
Mixed 129
SusWrite 85.1
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 17.7
56% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 39.6
38% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
317GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 77.5
Write 85.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 86.3
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Adata AD73I1C1674EV 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 SEC4251
Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback