TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 02:30
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,110
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 95.4%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 97.7
Parallax 88.9
81% 95.3 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 90
Splatting 76.3
71% 88.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 116 154 123 65 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 454
Write 340
Mixed 333
SusWrite 157
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 40.3
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 201
175% 256 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 87.4%
 Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 180 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 164
Mixed 106
SusWrite 180
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
1TB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 62
SusWrite 106
132% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E85-3000D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 20
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 70.5%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel  $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples844x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples391x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples47x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples428x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples356x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $459Bench 158%, 218,061 samples95x
SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples261x
M370 1TBMSIBench 210%, 3,658 samples188x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $79Bench 251%, 14,932 samples115x
RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples299x
D4U0830160B 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 1,031 samples171x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples148x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback