PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111020 |
Uptime | 14.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 05 '21 at 01:10 |
Run Duration | 280 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
33.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 41 49 47 47 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
25GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
160GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 81 83 83 84 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
67GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 60 60 60 56 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
18GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 1 7.1 19 MB/s
|
||||
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
47GB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 26 24 20 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 6 | 5 | 60 | 20" | 1280 720 | ACR0008 Acer X203W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 398x |
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 253x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 178x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 62x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $159 |