Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA760
Memory	20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210223
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 11:22
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 244 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 602 64% 509 Pts	64-Core 810 50% 810 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop) 16,265 User benchmarks, average bench 125% Device(1A58 3003) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 175 Parallax 162 128% 165 fps	MRender 156 Gravity 131 Splatting 115 107% 134 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 144%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 254% 564GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1046 1192 1216 1228 1293 1299 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 1,975 Write 1,805 Mixed 1515 SusWrite 1,212 365% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 65.4 215% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 768 DQ Mixed 836 636% 860 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 22.5 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 24.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	360	17.3"	1280 720	AUOE295

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	238x

GPU
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	83x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	72x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	42x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	61x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	14x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	67x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	42x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16