Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 60.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 917
81% 689 Pts
64-Core 2,408
149% 2,408 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 254
Parallax 311
226% 281 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 235
Splatting 172
186% 236 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 190%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000L7 1TB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L7QCXY7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,830
Write 1,523
Mixed 912
315% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.7
207% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 389
339% 522 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 450 446 456 455 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 444
Mixed 400
SusWrite 452
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 41.4
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 287
236% 339 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
596GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 468 466 468 466 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 404
Write 470
Mixed 366
SusWrite 467
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 34.7
102% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 305
215% 266 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 101%
Sm951 NVMe SAMSUNG 256GB
106GB free
Firmware: BXW74D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 1214 1208 1197 1086 622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,186
Mixed 849
SusWrite 1,090
252% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.6
179% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 574
444% 621 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 205%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
802GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 80 84 72 82 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 20.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 77.1
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 138 135 136 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 97
Write 103
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 136
66% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 48.2
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 122%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 38.2" 1280 720 GSM7735 38GL950G
Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback