HP Pro 3410 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pro 3410 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD2
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 183
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
EVGA(3842 C988) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 2.6
6% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 3.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
564GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 75 77 82 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 80.8
Write 69.1
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 74.2
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%
Gb0500ea FYL 500GB
242GB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.1
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 98.2
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3410 Series Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3410 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback