Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 904
81% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.8% Good
Lighting 82.4
Reflection 99.9
Parallax 91.1
67% 91.1 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 77.5
72% 89.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 188 184 179 178 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 884
Write 654
Mixed 334
SusWrite 184
114% 514 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 38.7
128% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 332
275% 407 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 144%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 182 186 185 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 187
Mixed 96
SusWrite 183
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WD Re 2TB-$28
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 90.8
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 110
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST4000NC001-1FS168 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 139 138 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 138
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST4000NC001-1FS168 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 144 144 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 137
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 144
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 64GB
2746, 2746, 2746, 2746 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 32.4
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 72.3" 1280 701 MJI0031 marantz-AVR
Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback