Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 05:01
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 124
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 465
62% 463 Pts
64-Core 461
29% 461 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Nvidia(10DE 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1680 1727 1624 1598 1622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,870
Write 1,403
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 1,610
338% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 67
229% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 722
557% 763 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 279%
Great: 332%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
197GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 87.1
Write 89
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 56
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 60%
Asmedia ASM1053E 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 38.9
Write 30.6
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 40.6
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 94 94 98 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 90.7
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 95.2
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
156GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 215 212 204 205 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 207
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 7R 5G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 35% 40 272 192 60 7.2" 1920 1080 SAM069B SAMSUNG
History: Score 42: 6R 4G 0B | Score 44: 7R 3G 0B | Score 52: 7R 5G 2B
Typical GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $722
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback