bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ77BH-55K
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130517
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '17 at 21:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 176
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 448
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BD) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 33.4
31% 36.4 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 32.6
28% 35 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 509
Write 347
Mixed 349
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 8.1
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 8
24% 49 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 105
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
31GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 78.2
Write 77.1
Mixed 73.3
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.43
110% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-090.A01LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback