Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 16:34
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$125 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 147 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 452 46% 371 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 143 Parallax 150 101% 139 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 148 Splatting 120 105% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4258 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2696 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 48 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 607 (EB) Unknown 99 99 470 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18844462656	94% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 388 Mixed 412 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 37.8 137% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 82 86% 143 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 96GB free Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 100 71 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2128 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 57 (A9) Unknown 100 100 36 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 40 (AE) Unknown 100 100 536 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 100 231928234020 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9660 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4544 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4754	77.8% Very good	Read 471 Write 410 Mixed 423 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 5.46 92% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 32.1 69% 141 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 67GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6095 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4843 (B1) Unknown 97 97 107 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1372 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14288317023	71.2% Very good	Read 495 Write 306 Mixed 381 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 19.4 87% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 64.4 70% 121 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 76%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 438GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 163 163 93 (03) Spinup time 126 126 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3635 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 46 46 155 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 6075 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2347 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 528 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 37066 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 214749151260 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	34% Below average	Read 103 Write 15.5 Mixed 26.9 36% 48.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.19 4K Mixed 0.11 28% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 203GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 131 1250 (04) Start/Stop count 12 12 88386 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9065 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8415 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 536 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2684 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 339405 (C2) HDA temperature 118 91 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.5% Average	Read 72.2 Write 72.1 Mixed 70.5 54% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.29 81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 41%
Lexar uSD UHS2 RDR 32GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID b055 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 230 Write 106 Mixed 116 170% 151 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 1.42 135% 4.96 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 21.5 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 14.9 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	12x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	2x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
HD 7970AMD $435Bench 36%, 6,727 samples	1x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x
840 Series 500GBSamsungBench 72%, 7,390 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 367 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16