Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1156
108% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,322
144% 2,322 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 35.2
28% 35.7 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 35
Splatting 25.4
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 961 950 964 958 963 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 3,745
Mixed 2,362
SusWrite 958
523% 2,312 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 91.6
316% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,036
838% 1,191 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 300%
Great: 473%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
913GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 145 148 150 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 86.6
Write 119
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 145
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 139 141 144 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 137
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 141
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 40.2
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 40.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 112%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback