Acer Aspire GX-281

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire GX-281  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire GX-281
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 10:29
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 57.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
63% 114 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 539
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 2438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 58.8
48% 61.5 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 61.7
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 356 376 363 380 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 435
Write 390
Mixed 350
SusWrite 364
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 28
96% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 116
95% 141 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
883GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 172 164 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 107
SusWrite 170
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 29.9
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 33.9
42% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 3% 74 210 31 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0DB1 T24E390
Typical Aspire GX-281 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Acer Aspire GX-281

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback