ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar TZ77A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	6.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Biostar TZ77A (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120214
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '14 at 02:32
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 88.4 2-Core 176 60% 132 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 334 44% 333 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4850 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Lighting 8.97 Reflection 7.73 Parallax 6.53 7% 7.74 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 6.17 Splatting 9.96 6% 7.45 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 46 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 105970070	65% Good	Read 392 Write 277 Mixed 197 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 18.8 102% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 42.7 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 19.8 25% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 719GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 72 71 8665 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1485 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11512 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1348 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 43 244814118952 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 20 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1515	72.5% Very good	Read 117 Write 135 Mixed 70.3 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.61 4K Mixed 0.56 140% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 417GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 85 109663371 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7012 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 55 469697927 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 43194 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 398 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 30 623116325 (C2) HDA temperature 37 70 73014444069 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 50 115256002 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 16 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	37.6% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 66.9 Mixed 41.1 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.4 95% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1TB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 91.6 Write 94.6 Mixed 53.5 100% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 168GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 75.3 Write 84.2 Mixed 61.5 95% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.24 60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 38%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 77.8 Write 85.8 Mixed 82.7 108% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.24 78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 3GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 79.4 Write 85.3 Mixed 19.3 74% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical TZ77A Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77A - $105

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	12x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	5x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
SSD320 128GBTranscend $92Bench 46%, 1,687 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	2x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $655

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback