Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 14:50
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 100 51% 78 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 202 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% XFX(1682 2970) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 19.5 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 16.5 Splatting 9.6 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 291 302 293 290 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 364 Write 317 Mixed 269 SusWrite 287 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 25.3 111% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 95.9 DQ Mixed 40.1 38% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 128%
Maxtor 6B200P0 204GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 189GB free Firmware: AB4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 50.1 Write 56.2 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 55.3 36% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.4 146% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-134.A00LF 2x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	7	60	25.5"	1280 720	ACI26A3 ASUS VK266H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89TD PRO USB3 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	9x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	8x

GPU
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	4x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	2x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16