Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 477
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1334 MHz, MLim: 1554 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 27.2
18% 27.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 27.7
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 434 436 413 426 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 450
Mixed 336
SusWrite 410
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 43.9
148% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 256
184% 236 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 118%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54
410GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 101 100 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 95.9
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 99.6
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 76%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 0.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 2.6
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 75 18.9" 1280 720 DELF004 DELL SE198WFP
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback