Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 964
86% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 174
Parallax 175
144% 175 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 151
Splatting 126
124% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1460 1193 811 812 811 813 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2,348
Mixed 1,852
SusWrite 983
433% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 80.1
262% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 877
635% 829 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 280%
Great: 355%
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
434GB free
Firmware: S0221A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 386 386 386 386 386 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 460
Mixed 416
SusWrite 387
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 29.4
143% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 0.5
84% 200 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 99%
Jamesdonkey JD960 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 379 380 379 379 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 496
Write 441
Mixed 359
SusWrite 380
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 21.5
117% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 26.1
77% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 101%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
839GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 746 742 741 741 742 742 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 780
Write 749
Mixed 754
SusWrite 742
171% 756 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 65.7
216% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 956
680% 865 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 180%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 33.1
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 28.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 4R 7G 18B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 69% 42 341 280 144 24" 1920 1080 AUS24A3 MG248
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback