Lenovo 10A8S02F01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A8S02F01  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime19 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 538
59% 469 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR15FCHA 512GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0F10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 419 311 246 249 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 423
Mixed 358
SusWrite 314
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 39.1
134% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 326
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 7 5 60 23.8" 1920 1080 HPN366B HP 24mh
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback