Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 40%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 262
36% 264 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1B0A 233C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.27 fps
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 30 39 39 57 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 121
Write 93.6
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 51.7
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 79%
USB2.0 DISK 8GB
2GB free, PID ffff
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.8 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.5
5% 5.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 8% 104 4 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0456
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 18: 2R 1G 5B
Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback